Iâ€™m very concerned about the problem of "fake news" and what it means for journalists, politicians and the media-consuming public.
But, really, this isnâ€™t a new concern of mine. For many years, Iâ€™ve battled with the concept that the internet is always right.
Increasingly so, it isnâ€™t. Actually, itâ€™s wrong an awful lot.
In 1998, when Jeff Sherman and I launched OnMilwaukee.com, we chose a digital platform not just because we had a crystal ball for the future of media. We also couldnâ€™t afford to print a magazine and city guide; at the time, it was much cheaper to build a website.
Of course, the opposite is now true for us. Our infrastructure, from servers to programmers to designers to bandwidth, is a tremendous expense for our company. At our scale, it wouldâ€™ve been much cheaper to print OnMilwaukee on newsprint.
However, this was back in the Internet stone age â€“ we built OnMilwaukee from the ground up, before WordPress and other templatized options made it easier to publish something professional-looking. In fact, even as we grow revenue and readership, people still often compare us both to one-person and 1,000-person operations, because the perception is that all online media is basically the same.
That would be like comparing a major daily newspaper to a photocopied neighborhood newsletter. Theyâ€™re obviously nothing alike.
However, the problem of fake news takes advantage of this perception of homogeneity. At OnMilwaukee, we hire professional journalists and insist on integrity and quality. We donâ€™t always get it right, and while some assume we have a secret politicized agenda, I can tell you honestly that we do the best we can to present well-written, legitimate lifestyle news. We fact check and follow the rules like we learned in journalism school.
Not everybody does.
Some news organizations find themselves too short-staffed to do the great work they used to (see: the Journal Sentinel). Others assume that "first" trumps "best" (see: Buzzfeed). Some extremely agenda-driven organizations masquerade as news media (see: Breitbart). Worse, some just make stuff up and put it on a site that looks kind of legit (see: Pizzagate).
And hereâ€™s the problem: because of the way automated tools like Google and Facebook work, content doesnâ€™t need to be real, sourced or professionally produced to get read and shared. People fall for it who shouldnâ€™t, like the president-elect of the United States. While thereâ€™s a declining trust in mainstream media, thereâ€™s also an increasing propensity to share stuff that meets the consumerâ€™s need to support a point of view. Thatâ€™s confirmation bias and itâ€™s pretty scary.
Real content curation can only be done by humans; an algorithm can and will get it wrong. If fake news is believed, it almost becomes real news, because it gets attention it shouldnâ€™t. It can be monetizable, and the line between good and bad becomes blurred.
For example, Buzzfeedâ€™s potentially libelous decision to release an unverified intelligence report on Donald Trump â€“ thatâ€™s not fake news, but it might be completely untrue â€“ and Buzzfeed standing to make a lot of money from it. Alternatively, Gawker ran with the Hulk Hogan sex tape; that was real, but it also got them sued out of business.
Consumers should know that page views donâ€™t entirely equal revenue. Itâ€™s true that, generally speaking, the more traffic a news site gets, the more ads it can sell. But just being deluged with new traffic usually means we and others simply run remnant ads from Google Adwords. That tends to amount to peanuts. In fact, last January, when we covered "Making a Murderer" extensively, we actually lost money, because the bandwidth charges of a 10x spike in traffic outweighed the small revenue from all that unexpected and unsold new inventory.
However, fake news isnâ€™t really about making money. Itâ€™s about advancing a cause. And sadly, it works. So whatâ€™s the answer?
On a technical side, Google and Facebook could easily flag content thatâ€™s fake news, since these "articles" never come from a reputable news site. Software solutions, though, arenâ€™t enough. People need to stop believing everything they read. They must look at the Internet with a critical eye before clicking "share," "like" or "tweet this." That will require a culture change, and it might take some time.
So, expect the problem of fake news to get worse before it gets better. For publications like ours that pride ourselves on integrity and professionalism, and there are many others still out there, weâ€™ll keep doing what we do.
In time, we can only hope that readers realize that we have to earn their trust, and that doesnâ€™t happen overnight. Good journalism isnâ€™t dead yet, but it has its back to the wall. Itâ€™s up to all of us to make sure it finds its rightful place to inform and educate a skeptical yet gullible consumer from whom we derive our paychecks. Real news is still out there; you just might have to look a little harder to find it.
Thank you for being a voice on this issue. The other aspect that troubles me is the growing effort to paint ALLl of the media as untrustworthy or biased - so much so, that news sources that have traditionally been reliable (even if they have a political slant) in terms of fact checking and following a code of ethics - are now seen as untrustworthy. I know several people in my personal life who prefer to get "the real story" or "the untold story" from fake news sites because they've come to believe that sources like The Wall Street Journal or the New York Times or the BBC are part of some conspiracy. Yikes!
1 comment about this article.
Post your comment/review now
Recent Articles & Blogs by Andy Tarnoff
Published Dec. 16, 2017
People tell me I'm hard to shop for, and they're probably right. Lots of interesting stuff arrives in the mailbox here at OnMilwaukee for us to review, and admittedly, I tend to buy - or at least browse for - gadgets when I can't fall asleep. So, the least I can do is share everything I've learned with you this holiday season.
Published Dec. 15, 2017
Even at 138 years old, the Wisconsin Humane Society is an organization that doesn't rest on its laurels. Just this month, it announced it will acquire the Bay Area Humane Society in Green Bay and the Door County Humane Society, bringing its total number of campuses to five. Leading this charge is President and CEO Anne Reed, a lawyer by trade, who joined WHS in 2010.
Published Dec. 1, 2017
Depending on your pop culture perspective, you may know Milwaukee native Candice Michelle as a professional wrestler, Playboy model or the star of one-of-the-most talked about Super Bowl commercials in history. We caught up with her before she climbs into the ring for one more match.
Published Dec. 1, 2017
Another Milwaukee-area Bruegger's is closing its doors. This time, it's the Audubon Court location, and according to employees there, its final day is Dec. 10. The Downtown Bruegger's on Mason and Water Streets closed a year ago.
Published Dec. 1, 2017
The 2-year-old Brick Pub & Grill is lively and hopping. Owners Tim and Chelsea Hren attribute that mostly to the support from - and to - their community.
Published Nov. 28, 2017
While our natural inclination this season is to bury our faces into our phones, the coveted "family time" is an opportunity to take a much more low-tech approach to entertaining ourselves together.
Published Nov. 27, 2017
It's easy to get swept up in Cyber Monday mania, because scoring an amazing deal is an adrenaline rush. But just because it's cheap doesn't mean you need it, and plenty of pitfalls are out there that make this super shopping day less than spectacular than it's cracked up to be.
Published Nov. 23, 2017
When OnMilwaukee Publisher Andy Tarnoff spotted the Baskin-Robbins "Turkey Cake," he was intrigued. Is it turkey-flavored? What's that brown glaze all about? Does it contain bones? What's with its little feet?
Published Nov. 14, 2017
The DoubleTree by Hilton is exactly what a business traveler or visiting Marquette parent could ask for: consistent quality and a comfortable night's rest when the bulk of your day is earmarked for standing on a trade show floor.
Published Nov. 7, 2017
A few years ago, CNET ran a story posing the question, "How can 30-year-old receivers sound better than new ones?" Ben Carp still hears about this article all the time, and for the most part, he agrees with it.