![]() | rendraprihatin: NICE RT: @ABANG8: I have to finish my 4000 words essay about graffiti; art or vandalism? today! #sundayhopes please do help me if u have ... about 22 minutes ago |
![]() | abang8: I have to finish my 4000 words essay about graffiti; art or vandalism? today! #sundayhopes please do help me if u have opinion... about 35 minutes ago |
![]() | CBreezysLuver: We can now pre-order Graffiti or Graffiti the deluxe 2 disc album which will have extra songs on it from amazon about 8 hours ago |
![]() | emilysmith2000: Graffiti. It’s Good for Blight. Or Is It Bad? (@nytimes) link (via @laughing_squid) about 10 hours ago |
![]() | archivedigger: RT @laughing_squid: Graffiti. It’s Good for Blight. Or Is It Bad? (@nytimes) link about 10 hours ago |
![]() |
One of Milwaukee's numerous murals. |
| By Doug Hissom Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Doug Hissom |
| Published Jan. 16, 2009 at 5:15 a.m. |
|
Milwaukee Ald. Tony Zielinski continues to tag graffiti artists as public enemy No. 1. But at least one member of a city committee says his latest plan blurs the line between murals, graffiti and freedom of expression.
Zielinski is proposing an ordinance that would require any mural artist to apply for a permit and pay $75 in order to paint the side of a building. It would be "a mechanism to check these murals and make sure they're properly maintained" he said last week at the city's Zoning Code Technical Committee, which considers proposed ordinances concerning buildings and such.
But when committee member Stuart Mukamal -- an assistant city attorney -- pointed out that some of the language may step on First Amendment freedom of expression protections Zielinski slammed his brief case closed and stormed out of the meeting. He said he thought that the legal language issues had already been worked out in the city attorney's office and thought it too much of a delay to hash them out at the meeting. "Why would I want to discuss this now?" he yelled while leaving the room.
Mukamal said graffiti is subjective and that the proposal doesn't precisely clarify the difference between a mural and graffiti. He also said it must prove that murals and graffiti affect public's health, safety and welfare. He added that murals, considered non-commercial speech, have a higher standard of protection than, say, billboards, which are commercial speech and easier to regulate.
According to the proposed ordinance: "the Common Council finds that the objects depicted in some murals may cause distraction of motorists and lead to unsafe traffic conditions."Mukamal added that murals, considered non-commercial speech, have a higher standard of protection than, say, billboards, which are commercial speech and easier to regulate.
Another argument against elaborate murals is that they attract taggers who tag the paintings or will tag areas around the mural. Zielinski also says murals in the city are not being well-maintained.
Opponents to the ordinance included neighborhood organizers who put together mural projects in alleys that had been subject to repeated tagging, such as Sura Furaj, who organized the Riverwest "Art in the Alleys" project. Such effort give young people an additional artistic outlet.
"City leaders have a legitimate interest in fighting graffiti that property owners don't want on their homes and businesses, but murals -- approved by the property owners in advance -- are completely different," opined School Board member Jennifer Morales. "People living in the United States have a right to freedom of expression that does not harm others. Public art is an essential element of human creative expression, from the ancient cave paintings in Lascaux (in France) to last year's Riverwest Art in the Alleys project."
No mention of the proposed ordinance was made at this week's Anti-Graffiti Committee meeting, chaired by Zielinski.
In fact, city officials said tagging was down this year. Reports were heard that 10 taggers were arrested after people called the city's anti-graffiti tip line. Milwaukee's Municipal Court reports that arrests for graffiti in 2008 were about half that of 2007. Most cases concern graffiti paraphernalia, said the court's Kristine Hinrichs.
Plan B Works: Far-sighted thinking has worked out in the end. When Cardinal Capital Management wanted to build a housing complex for the mentally ill in an environmental corridor and on parkland on the South Side of Milwaukee, the developers were rebuffed not once, but twice. Both times company representatives argued that there was nowhere else in the city they could afford to build the project.
Nonetheless, aldermen sided with environmentalists and the local alderman, Zielinski, who opposed the plan, saying there were plenty of city lots available for such a project.
The developer was rejected twice for trying to build on parkland. Months later, Cardinal Capital was back with a similar proposal for another South Side site. This time no parkland was involved and their plan is to put the project on a vacant lot at 1537 W. National Ave.
The city has agreed to sell Cardinal Capital the lot for $3,600. The city acquired the lot in a tax foreclosure move.
Cardinal plans to build a $6.1 million building with 34 housing units run by Our Space, Inc. Cardinal hooked up with Our Space in its previous, failed effort. The project, called Oakton Manor, will be financed mostly through federal housing tax credits. After the closing, Cardinal will have nine months to finish the project.
Suspensions by the Numbers: Some interesting figures from the Milwaukee Public School system's touting that suspensions were down one-third for the first half of this school year compared to last year:
Taking into account suspensions of five days or more:
There were 24,386 suspensions for the first half of this year compared with 33,098 issued last year. MPS notes that the number of suspensions could include kids that had more than one suspension.
|
8 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by mitchgat on Jan. 28, 2009 at 12:42 p.m. (report)
I have always said they need to have a "Grafitti Park" where kids can PAY to create real works of art and citizens of MKE can PAY to see them. I'm not talking a lot of money for either, however if teens are willing to buy expensive video games, some would be willing to have a safe place where there art could be displayed. The problem with Milwaukee leaders is they are EXTREMELY fearful of thinking outside of the box and trying new things.
| Rate this: |
Posted by tomjulio on Jan. 17, 2009 at 1:50 p.m. (report)
"Outdoor murals are always ugly anyway." ...and sometimes you realize that ignorance is alive and well in the world.thriving even.
| Rate this: |
Posted by rabid652 on Jan. 16, 2009 at 12:46 p.m. (report)
I believe this is the same guy that is on a crusade against the Cactus Club. You really gotta wonder why anyone still votes for this guy.
| Rate this: |
Posted by darthfader on Jan. 16, 2009 at 12:20 p.m. (report)
No wonder young adults are leaving this city in droves! Who wants to live in a boring colorless city? I for one - do not. The murals and painted walls of this city are beautiful. They improve our urban landscape. And for those ignorant people out there - the murals DO NOT encourage graffiti. It makes me sad that our aldermen and my fellow citizens are so misinformed.
| Rate this: |
Posted by jjrakman on Jan. 16, 2009 at 12:02 p.m. (report)
Outdoor murals are always ugly anyway.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |